Skip to main content
Esc

Type to search

Articles / prop-trading / The Overlooked Rules of Prop Trading: A Velotrade Comparative Review of Six Leading Firms

The Overlooked Rules of Prop Trading: A Velotrade Comparative Review of Six Leading Firms

Jul 29, 2026 · Source: finbold.com · Topic:  prop-trading
Trader Payout Rate
7%
Percentage of traders who ever collected a payout from funded accounts.
Challenge Success Rate
14%
Percentage of traders who passed a challenge in the studied dataset.
Failure Due to Loss Limits
70%
Percentage of trader failures attributed to breached loss limits rather than missed profit targets.

§ 01 Executive Snapshot

  • What: Velotrade's 2026 Prop Firm Transparency Report highlights the hidden rules affecting trader payouts in funded accounts.
  • Who: Key firms reviewed include Topstep, FTMO, FundingPips, Blue Guardian, HyroTrader, and Velotrade.
  • Why it matters: The findings reveal that most account closures are due to rule violations rather than trading performance, raising concerns about transparency in the prop trading industry.

§ 02 Key Developments

  • Among over 300,000 funded accounts studied, only about 7% of traders ever collected a payout, with only around 14% passing a challenge.
  • A separate study of 500,000 traders found that roughly 70% of failures were due to breached loss limits rather than missed profit targets.
  • Consistency rules can wipe out 33% to 50% of the profit earned on a strong trading day, as observed in four of the six firms reviewed.

§ 03 Strategic Context

  • The demand for funded accounts has significantly increased, with monthly searches for "prop firm" rising from about 880 in early 2020 to roughly 49,500 by 2025.
  • Despite the rise in demand, the number of prop trading providers has decreased, highlighting a market contraction amid growing interest.

§ 04 Strategic Implications

  • Immediate consequences include heightened scrutiny on prop trading firms regarding transparency and the clarity of their rules.
  • Long-term implications may involve regulatory changes that redefine how prop trading firms operate and disclose their terms to potential traders.

§ 05 Risks & Constraints

  • A potential risk includes regulatory actions, as the US CFTC is considering whether challenge fees amount to commodity-pool participation interests.
  • Competition and market dynamics could be strained, especially as established firms have longer histories and payout track records compared to newer entrants like Velotrade.

§ 06 Watchlist / Forward Signals

  • A public consultation by the US CFTC is expected to open on 1 August 2026, which may lead to significant regulatory changes.
  • The upcoming responses from regulators in Europe, Australia, and North America regarding prop firm marketing practices will signal the industry's future landscape.
§ 07

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Velotrade's 2026 Prop Firm Transparency Report reveal?

It highlighted hidden rules affecting trader payouts in funded accounts, showing that most account closures are due to rule violations rather than trading performance.

How many traders actually collect payouts from funded accounts?

Among over 300,000 funded accounts studied, only about 7% of traders ever collected a payout.

Why is there growing scrutiny on prop trading firms?

There is heightened scrutiny due to concerns about transparency and the clarity of rules affecting trader payouts.

When is the public consultation by the US CFTC expected to open?

The public consultation is expected to open on 1 August 2026.

§ 08

Related Articles