Skip to main content
Esc

Type to search

Articles / prediction-markets / Gaming Industry, Tribes and Unions Press Senate to Ban Sports Prediction Markets in Crypto Bill

Gaming Industry, Tribes and Unions Press Senate to Ban Sports Prediction Markets in Crypto Bill

Jun 18, 2026 · Source: thedefiant.io · Topic:  prediction-markets
Estimated State Tax Revenue Loss
$1 billion
Estimated tax revenue lost by states due to prediction markets since the start of 2025.
Kalshi Valuation
$22 billion
Valuation of Kalshi following a funding round where it raised $1 billion.
Galaxy Digital Trade Amount
$10 million
Amount of an OTC trade executed by Galaxy Digital on CLARITY Act passage odds.

§ 01 Executive Snapshot

  • What: A coalition led by the American Gaming Association is urging the Senate to ban sports prediction markets in a pending crypto market-structure bill.
  • Who: Key players include the American Gaming Association, tribal groups, hospitality unions, and prediction market operators like Kalshi and Polymarket.
  • Why it matters: The outcome could significantly impact the regulatory landscape for prediction markets and sports betting, potentially affecting state revenues and tribal gaming operations.

§ 02 Key Developments

  • The coalition argues that prediction markets have contributed to a $1 billion loss in tax revenue for states since the start of 2025.
  • The CLARITY Act is the primary federal legislation that could potentially include a ban on sports prediction markets.
  • Senators Adam Schiff and John Curtis introduced the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act in March, which would prohibit sports and casino-style event contracts on federally registered platforms.

§ 03 Strategic Context

  • The push against prediction markets aligns with broader regulatory efforts to clarify the jurisdiction of the CFTC over event contracts, particularly in the context of sports betting.
  • This legislative effort occurs amidst ongoing litigation between state regulators and the CFTC regarding control over prediction markets, highlighting a significant regulatory battle.

§ 04 Strategic Implications

  • If the ban is enacted, it could lead to a substantial decrease in the volume of trades for platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, which rely heavily on sports contracts.
  • Long-term, this could set a precedent for how prediction markets are regulated, potentially impacting their growth and innovation in the gaming space.

§ 05 Risks & Constraints

  • There is a risk of significant pushback from prediction market operators who contest the coalition's revenue loss claims and assert their legal standing.
  • Ongoing litigation in various states could create a fragmented regulatory environment that complicates compliance for prediction market platforms.

§ 06 Watchlist / Forward Signals

  • The Senate has yet to schedule a vote on the CLARITY Act, which will be a key milestone for the coalition's efforts.
  • Future developments to watch include the potential outcomes of state-level lawsuits against prediction market platforms and any amendments proposed during the Senate discussions on the CLARITY Act.
§ 07

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the coalition urging the Senate to do?

The coalition led by the American Gaming Association is urging the Senate to ban sports prediction markets in a pending crypto market-structure bill.

Why is the ban on sports prediction markets significant?

The ban could significantly impact the regulatory landscape for prediction markets and sports betting, affecting state revenues and tribal gaming operations.

Who introduced the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act?

Senators Adam Schiff and John Curtis introduced the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act in March.

How might the ban affect platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket?

If the ban is enacted, it could lead to a substantial decrease in the volume of trades for platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, which rely heavily on sports contracts.

§ 08

Related Articles