Skip to main content
Esc

Type to search

Articles / mica-regulation / MiCA Decoded: 174 Registered CASPs, but Only 14 Can Operate a Centralized Crypto Exchange (CEX)?

MiCA Decoded: 174 Registered CASPs, but Only 14 Can Operate a Centralized Crypto Exchange (CEX)?

Registered CASPs
174
Total number of registered Crypto Asset Service Providers in the EU under MiCA regulation
Authorized CEXs
14
Number of entities authorized to operate a centralized crypto exchange in the EU
CASP Authorizations in Germany
51
Number of CASP authorizations held by entities in Germany, leading the EU

§ 01 Executive Snapshot

  • What: The EU has issued 174 MiCA licenses, but only 14 entities are authorized to operate a centralized crypto exchange (CEX).
  • Who: Key players include LegalBison, Commerzbank, Coinbase, Kraken, eToro, and Bitstamp, among others.
  • Why it matters: This discrepancy highlights the challenges and regulatory landscape for crypto businesses in Europe, affecting market competition and operational strategies.

§ 02 Key Developments

  • As of March 2026, there are 174 registered CASPs in the EU under MiCA regulation, with only 14 authorized to operate trading platforms.
  • Germany leads with 51 CASP authorizations, primarily from traditional financial institutions, while Malta and Cyprus host major global exchanges.
  • The MiCA regulation defines 10 categories of crypto-asset services, with custody and administration services being the most common among registered entities.

§ 03 Strategic Context

  • The MiCA regulatory framework is designed to provide a unified approach to crypto-asset services across the EU, aiming to enhance consumer protection and market integrity.
  • The clustering of licenses in certain jurisdictions reflects the historical relationships and regulatory familiarity between crypto firms and local regulators.

§ 04 Strategic Implications

  • The limited number of authorized trading platforms may restrict market access and competition, potentially leading to higher trading costs for consumers.
  • The regulatory environment will likely influence future business models and the geographical distribution of crypto exchanges in Europe.

§ 05 Risks & Constraints

  • Regulatory delays and the complexity of navigating multiple jurisdictions may hinder the speed at which new crypto businesses can launch.
  • Competition from established financial institutions in licensing processes may create barriers for new entrants in the crypto space.

§ 06 Watchlist / Forward Signals

  • Future developments to watch include the expansion of MiCA licenses and any regulatory changes that may emerge as the market evolves.
  • The performance and operational success of the 14 authorized trading platforms will serve as benchmarks for future applicants in the EU market.
§ 08

Related Articles