Skip to main content
Esc

Type to search

Articles / bitcoin-institutional / BIP-110 Bitcoin Fork Stalls at Two Blocks as Its Only Miner Quits

BIP-110 Bitcoin Fork Stalls at Two Blocks as Its Only Miner Quits

Peak Signaling Support
2.53%
The highest percentage of blocks signaling support for BIP-110 during the final signaling period.
Blocks Needed for Activation
2,015 blocks
The number of additional blocks that must be mined at full network difficulty for BIP-110 to activate.
Hashrate Loss Due to Misdirected Mining
$43k USD/day
Estimated financial impact on miners due to misdirected hashrate during the BIP-110 fork.

§ 01 Executive Snapshot

  • What: The BIP-110 Bitcoin fork has stalled at two blocks after its only miner, the Roughnecks, has quit mining.
  • Who: Key players include Luke Dashjr, Dathon Ohm, and the mining pool Ocean, along with the Roughnecks group.
  • Why it matters: This event highlights the challenges of implementing new proposals within the Bitcoin network and the significant influence of major mining pools on the consensus process.

§ 02 Key Developments

  • The BIP-110 proposal requires 2,015 more blocks to be mined at full network difficulty to activate but has not produced a block since Saturday night.
  • BIP-110 peaked at only 2.53% signaling support, with all 51 blocks coming from Ocean, which represented 3.4% of the total in the final signaling period.
  • The Roughnecks mining group has reversed their decision to stop mining, stating they will continue until a proof-of-work change can be implemented.

§ 03 Strategic Context

  • BIP-110 was introduced to address data-embedding techniques that proponents argue burden node operators, but it has faced significant opposition and lack of consensus.
  • The proposal's activation design, requiring a 55% miner threshold, contrasts with the 95% required for previous soft forks, demonstrating a shift in community dynamics regarding governance.

§ 04 Strategic Implications

  • The immediate implication is that the BIP-110 proposal is unlikely to succeed without a substantial change in miner support, which may affect future proposals and governance in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
  • Long-term, the failure of BIP-110 could discourage future attempts at similar changes, reinforcing the dominance of existing consensus mechanisms and the influence of large mining pools.

§ 05 Risks & Constraints

  • A significant risk is the potential for regulatory scrutiny or backlash against the centralized control exhibited by large mining pools, which may lead to further fragmentation within the Bitcoin community.
  • The technical feasibility of implementing a new proof-of-work algorithm poses execution challenges that could delay or prevent any progress on the BIP-110 initiative.

§ 06 Watchlist / Forward Signals

  • Monitoring the activity of the Roughnecks and Ocean mining pool will be crucial to understanding any shifts in support for BIP-110 or potential new proposals.
  • Future developments, such as any announcements regarding proof-of-work changes or changes in miner signaling behavior, will be critical indicators of the proposal's viability.
§ 07

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened to the BIP-110 Bitcoin fork?

The BIP-110 Bitcoin fork has stalled at two blocks after its only miner, the Roughnecks, quit mining.

Why is the BIP-110 proposal significant?

It highlights the challenges of implementing new proposals within the Bitcoin network and the influence of major mining pools on the consensus process.

How many more blocks does BIP-110 need to be mined for activation?

BIP-110 requires 2,015 more blocks to be mined at full network difficulty to activate.

Who were the key players involved in the BIP-110 proposal?

Key players include Luke Dashjr, Dathon Ohm, the mining pool Ocean, and the Roughnecks group.

§ 08

Related Articles